Comparison

XIAgenda vs MednIA

This is the closest matchup: both have a real AI agent over WhatsApp. The difference is in the focus. We'll give it to you straight.

The core difference: the focus

MednIA aims to be an all-in-one system: beyond the agent, it adds electronic invoicing (AFIP) and medical records (FHIR). If what you're looking for is to centralize everything —including the accounting and clinical side— in a single tool, that's its turf and it does it well.

XIAgenda chooses to focus on what moves the needle for the practice: the conversational experience and patient memory. We don't do AFIP invoicing or medical records — on purpose.

Our moat: the memory that can't be copied

XIAgenda recognizes each patient —their health plan, their preferences, their history— and that relationship is built appointment by appointment. It's the one thing a competitor can't clone even if they copy every feature. More on that here.

Pricing out in the open

MednIA doesn't publish its pricing (it's consultative). XIAgenda tells you up front: per professional, from US$15 a month (3 plans), with a free trial and no card required. No meetings just to find out what it costs.

So, which one?

If you need an all-in-one with invoicing and medical records, MednIA is a serious option. If you want the best conversational experience, patient memory as an advantage, and clear pricing —without paying for modules you won't use—, that's XIAgenda.